|
Statement of the Association of World
Citizens for the Special Session of the UN Human Rights Council
on May 22, 2008
Dear Colleague,
I am pleased to send you the written statement of the Association
of World Citizens for the Special Session of the UN Human Rights
Council on 22 May 2008 devoted to "The negative impact on
the realization of the right to food of the worsening of the
world food crisis". There is increasing attention being
given to the high price of food, an issue that will be central
to the 3-5 June high-level conference on world food security
to be held at the FAO in Rome at which the Association of World
Citizens will also be represented. Yet, beyond the short-term
impact, there are deeper structrual issues, highlighting the
need for a World Food Policy and Plan of Action.
I would be pleased if you could share this text widely.
Sincerely yours, Rene Wadlow
Representative to the United Nations,
Geneva, Association of World Citizens
World Food Policy
Citizens of the World welcome
the Special Session of the Human Rights Council devoted to the
Right to Food and the current world food crisis. Today, cooperation
is needed among the UN family of agencies, national governments,
non-governmental organizations, and the millions of food producers
to respond to the food crisis which has already led to destabilizing
food riots. There is a need for swift, short-term measures to
help people now suffering from lack of food and malnutrition
due to high food prices, inadequate distribution, and situations
of violence. Such short-term action requires additional funding
for the UN World Food Programme and the release of national food
stocks. However, it is the longer-range and structural issues
on which we must focus our attention. The world requires a World
Food Policy and a clear Plan of Action.
At the Rome World Food Conference
in November 1974, the then US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger
declared that the bold objective of the conference was that "within
a decade, no child will go hungry, no family will fear for its
next day's bread, and no human being's future and capacity will
be stunted by malnutrition."
(1) Yet in 1996, then UN Secretary General Boutros
Boutros-Ghali could write "There has been little progress
in reducing malnutrition. In sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia,
the number of malnourished children is actually rising. Almost
a third of all children under five in developing countries are
malnourished, and malnutrition still contributes to more than
half the deaths of young children in these countries." Even
the modest Millennium Development goal of halving hunger by 2015
is not being met. Thus, we must agree with a World Bank evaluation
that "The development community, and the world as a whole,
has consistently failed to address malnutrition over the past
decades."
(2) A central theme which citizens of the world have
long stressed is that there needs to be a world food policy and
that a world food policy is more than the sum of national food
security programs. Food security has too often been treated as
a collection of national problems. Typical of this approach is
the General Comment 12 on The Right to Adequate Food of the UN
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights "The Covenant
clearly requires that each State party take whatever steps are
necessary to ensure that everyone is free from hunger and as
soon as possible can enjoy the right to adequate food. This will
require the adoption of a national strategy to ensure food and
nutrition security for all, based on human rights principles
that define the objectives, and the formulation of policies and
corresponding benchmarks."
(3) Yet the focus on the formulation of national plans
is clearly inadequate. There is a need for a world plan of action
with focused attention to the role that UN and regional institutions
must play if hunger is to be sharply reduced. It is clear that
certain regional bodies, such as the European Union, already
play an important role in setting agricultural policy both in
terms of production and export policy. There may be a time when
the African Union also will play a crucial role in setting policy,
monitoring and coordinating agriculture.
It is certain that attention
must be given to the local and national level of food production,
distribution, and food security. Attention needs to be given
to cultural factors, the division of labor between women and
men in agriculture and rural development, in marketing local
food products, to the role of small farmers, to the role of landless
agricultural labor, and land-holding patterns.
However, for the formulation
of a dynamic world food policy, world economic trends and structures
need to be analysed, and policy goals made clear. There are at
least five areas that world citizens suggest as a focus for the
Special Session: climate change, energy costs, ethanol, the food
production and export policy of major agricultural production
States, the role of speculation in commodities.
1) There is a need to intensify action on climate
change. This year (2007-2008), there has been bad weather in
key growing areas. Australia, normally the world's second-largest
wheat exporter, has been suffering from an epic drought. This
may be a result of particular weather conditions this year or
may be a sign of climate change. It is necessary to analyse the
impact of climate change on long-term food production and see
alternative strategies.
2) Higher prices for food are in part a reflection
of the higher price of oil and energy costs. Much modern farming
is energy-intensive for producing fertilizers, running tractors,
and transporting farm products to consumers, often at long distances.
Oil prices are influenced by the violence and social breakdown
in Iraq and heavy speculation on the oil markets. There is need
both for short term measures to bring oil prices down to a reasonable
level based on production costs and transportation as well as
longer-range energy policies to free countries from oil dependence.
3) Higher prices for oil have encouraged a greater
use of ethanol and other biofuels, often without consideration
of the impact of the production of biofuels on land use and food
production. While biofuels are likely to be useful, their use
should be limited at present so that the consequences of their
use can be studied and biofuels developed from non-food sources.
4) Governmental food and agriculture policies need
to be analysed and reviewed carefully. The agricultural policies
of the European Union and the larger food-exporting countries
- USA, Canada, Brazil, Australia - need to be reviewed along
with the impact of agricultural subsidies and export encouragement.
5) There needs to be a detailed analysis ot the role
of speculation in the rise of commodity prices. Banks and hedge
funds, having lost money in the real estate mortgage packages,
are now investing massively in commodities. For the moment, there
is little governmental regulation of this speculation. There
needs to be an analysis of these financial flows and their impact
on the price of grains.
A world food policy for the welfare
of all requires a close look at world institutions and patterns
of production and trade. As Stringfellow Barr wrote in his 1952
book Citizens of the World " Since the hungry billion in
the world community believe that we can all eat if we set our
common house in order, they believe also that it is unjust that
some men die because it is too much trouble to arrange for them
to live."
Notes
1) November 5, 1974, address to the World Food Conference.
The 1974 World Food Conference was one in a series of UN-sponsored
conferences calling attention to hunger and the need for food
security. Major conferences with concluding statements of goals
include:
The Special Assembly on Man's
Right to Freedom from Hunger, 1963
Plan of Action on World Food
Security, 1979
World Food Security Compact,
1985
World Summit for Children, 1990
International Conference on Nutrition,
1992
World Food Summit, 1996
Millennium Development Summit;
2000
World Food Summit Plus Five,
2001
2) World Bank.Repositioning Nutrition as Central
to Development: A Strategy For Large-Scale Action (2006)
3) UNCESCR General Comment 12, UN Doc. ECOSOC E/C12/1999/5
|